Recently tiny homes and mobile homes have become a rising trend in housing and has become something that people are starting to enjoy. However tiny homes remain pretty stationary they aren’t built to be constantly moved or lived in on the go. So yes, people have become to adjust to the idea of tiny houses because the shift is only downsizing the home, where as mobile living is still classified as “trashy” and unorthodox. I’m not talking about an RV or a trailer, I’m talking about true mobile housing where the entire structure is meant to be on the go constantly and is built to travel.
I’m curious as to why these types of living are classified below others, it isn’t living in a trailer park and it isn’t camping. The idea I’m thinking of is much better, it is taking a large vehicle and creating a home within it and then having the ability to travel with it wherever you need. Making a complete living environment and creating an elegant living situation that allows for one to reside at little or no costs. This would make anyone’s time in the structure rent free, bill free and mortgage free, which allows them to have a period of time where they are able to make and save money, no real costs other than food and general needs. The idea is cheaper than regular housing which may be why it is frowned upon, not many have come to the point where they will accept cheaper ways to live and that a house, mortgage and debt aren’t necessary.
Mobile living spaces are optimal for many young people with multiple aspirations, a space to live, work and also travel with. The idea covers everything you could need with a pretty decent startup cost of around 15 thousand dollars. However it is a one time cost and after that there isn’t much need to pay for anything else. For young people who are taking time off to work and find themselves doesn’t this make perfect sense? Why would you want to work long hours for a job you probably don’t like only to lose over half that money to bills and rent. It doesn’t make sense to spend so much of that money on something you won’t be keeping. Why are we all so accustomed to paying for temporary housing or something that won’t last. Young people can rarely afford to purchase property or land, so they are caught in the cycle of renting something. Where this option allows you to own both home and vehicle in one and go through however long you want with something that you own, something that is yours. Then when you feel done with it you can sell it off and make some return off it. You’ll never see any money from an apartment come back, so you’re already a step ahead.
If there is so much good to them why are they so frowned upon and why is there this stigma as to people who live in mobile structures. My fear is that you get classified with people who live in trailer parks or such stereotypes. Either you are low income and you can’t afford a real house or other such reasons. Mainly there are say 4 or 5 homes built like the way I am talking about and this means that it one isn’t popular and it is still unknown, for it to be a more acceptable idea there needs to be more higher income or top of the chain kind of people choosing to live in these. Or they need to become something that trends just like the tiny house movement.
Finally the greatest difference between tiny houses and mobile living is exactly that, one is a residential unit placed in a stationary position while the other has the ability to function on it’s own and can go anywhere you want. Which in my mind for every young person looking at these options would be the better option. Trips and so forth all become simple and really easy to just pick up and leave. If the mobile living idea could catch some more attention and become a trend like the tiny houses maybe there wouldn’t be such a stigma to what kind of people would live like this.
Once again thanks for reading and thanks for checking in! Love sharing thoughts and opinions and as always I hope you have an amazing day!